Saint Anselm House of Studies

We are seeking young vocations to the true Catholic priesthood without compromise to the conciliar church. The Holy Cross Monastery, located in Nova Friburgo, Brazil, offers to all interested the possibility to get a good priestly formation with yesterday's culture, which does not entail Chemistry or Physics, or  mathematics, or technology, but the higher knowledge that is composed of true wisdom.

For starters, we will offer courses of History, Music, Literature, Portuguese Grammar, Catechism and above all: Latin. We will try to adapt ourselves to the level of young people who show up. Everyone will remain perfectly free to leave at any time, and nothing will obligate them to follow a religious or priestly vocation.

It is all about offering those interested a bit of good classical and Christian culture of the Old World Order, of Christ the King, which is diametrically opposed to the anti-culture of the New World Order.

Young people interested should contact Professor Carlos Nougué by email carlosnougue@gmail.com.

In nomine Christi,
Fr. Thomas Aquinas OSB

Quo Vadis Campos? 24 year anniversary of the death of the Lion of Campos

Quo Vadis Campos: a look into the defection of the traditionalist diocese of Campos in honor of the 24 year anniversary of the death of Bishop de Castro Mayer, the Lion of Campos.

In Memoriam

On his death bed, Bishop de Castro Mayer refused to sign a so-called "formula of reconciliation" (which would include an admission that excommunication was really incurred and that no situation of necessity, as claimed by Lefebvre and Castro Mayer, had existed in 1988) proposed by Vatican delegates at his death bed. He died of respiratory failure in Campos on 25 April 1991.  For those who accept the excommunications as valid, this would mean that Bishop de Castro Mayer died outside of the Church where there is no salvation, but we know that this simply is not the case.  May Bishop de Castro Mayer be an inspiration for us to continue to fight against modernism. 

Note from the author: Let this inside look into the Campos defection serve as a realistic look at how the traditionalist defection and treachery is possible and how souls are misled by some of the bravest priests and traditionalist groups, specifically those who blindly follow Menzingen and the leadership of the neo-SSPX, under the false pretext of defending the SSPX of Archbishop Lefebvre.

Bishop Rangel 1991

Upon returning from the consecration of Bishop Faure and later the first priestly ordination for the Priestly Union Marcel Lefebvre, that of Fr. André Zelaya de Leon from Guatemala, our group from the small resistance chapel in Vitoria, Espirito Santo passes through the legendary ex-traditionalist diocese of Campos which is situated between Rio de Janeiro and Espirito Santo.  By chance, we happened to stop in São Fidelis.  I was conscience of the fact, but not sure if the others from our chapel were, that São Fidelis happened to be the city that on July 28th, 1991 was selected to have the honor of the last prior consecration for Tradition without the permission of modernist Rome.  This was the consecration of Bishop Rangel, who was selected to succeed the great Bishop de Castro Mayer, co-consecrator of the four bishops of the SSPX, including Bishop Williamson.  Bishop Williamson, one of the co-consecrators of Bishop Rangel, describes the moment beautifully: "The people had long been fervently praying to have a bishop, so they saw in the event of July 28 the answer to their prayers. As they waited for the ceremony to begin and the three bishops, one consecrator and two co-consecrators, came in view, many women openly cried and the men held back their tears – the Church lives!"  

Traditionalist bishop consecrated and
excommunicated attracts attention in
São Fidelis.

Dom Antônio, the Lion of Campos.

This is all very interesting to me being an American living in Brazil and having been influenced by the story of Campos as a teenager, I believe that Bishop de Castro Mayer will one day be vindicated and canonized as well as Archbishop Lefebvre.  Anybody who has seen the impression left in Campos by Bishop de Castro Mayer (from now on Dom Antônio as he is referred to here in Brazil), despite recent setbacks from the current situation, would have little doubt regarding his sanctity.  Having been able to resolve old problems troubling the Franciscan and Carmelite religious third orders and restoring them to their prestigious position in his diocese from the beginning, it is only fitting that he be a patron to third order members.

Street Dom Antônio de Castro Mayer

São Fidelis

Returning back to my story, the group with my wife and I from the small resistance chapel of Vitoria stopped in São Fidelis to get a quick bite to eat.  Sure it's a decent sized Brazilian town and with the rented transportation we used to transport our group there wasn't much of an opportunity of having momentary detours.  However, while waiting for our pizza to come to the table someone called it to my attention that there was an interesting church nearby and another lad ran off to take a curious look, so naturally, I followed behind.  We were amazed to see an enormous church springing to life so we approached to get another look. I should point out that as usual I was the only foreigner but the Brazilian with me shared the same awestruck moment.  This church was situated on the street Dom Antônio de Castro Mayer.  The temple was huge in comparison with what I am used to.  I grew up attending only Society Masses, many times in small chapels and hotel conference rooms, and these days in Brazil the resistance chapels mostly function from small chapels added on to someone's private home.  There was one gaping detail that dawned on us.  This was no regular church.  We had never seen anything like it.  Sure the seminary in Winona can

The altar in São Fidelis.

compare or even the chapel of my confirmation, but this was different.  This was a structure that apparently formed part of the diocese! Here in Brazil the diocesan churches are all renovated and rarely even include crucifixes, ugly structures which do not invoke piety and seem more welcoming to protestants, churches adorned with twisted crosses on their roofs. This huge edifice was entirely different.  It had immaculate communion rails!  There was an altar set for the true sacrifice of the Mass and there was no table.  There was no "mass table" in sight.  Even the Brazilian didn't believe it as I pointed it out to him.  "No, no", he says "there surely is".  We entered to approach to get a better look at this beauty to confirm what our eyes could hardly believe.  This was a 100% pre-Vatican 2 church structure, at least for the time being because the young girl passing out fliers in front assured us that sometime in the near future the New Mass will be offered in this church.  We did what we could to convince her to not accept it, but I sensed a lack of interest in our opinions regarding the whole scene.  She informed us that it was a church under the care of the Apostolic Administration of St. John Marie Vianney.

A church with communion rails.

We went back to get the others and tell them about what we found and went back a second time.  This time we were approached by an elder laywoman who showed us around.  She knew Dom Antônio and told us about how the modernist bishop Navarro kicked them out of their parishes. She told us, for whatever motive, that she had attended the other Mass a few times in the regular parish but never wore jeans or went without a veil. Unfortunately, the current agreement between Rome and the Campos priests has led to a softening of position in the laity (not just the priests).  As I was leaving I noticed the huge wooden doors were carved with a beautiful coat of arms of Dom Antônio, among other things.  

Coat of Arms of Dom Antônio

The doors of São Fidelis

As we were leaving to return to have supper, the Campos priest was entering the church to prepare to have a traditional Mass.  I later learned (through his facebook account) that the priest's name is Father Gasper Pelegrini.  We only spoke to him momentarily, long enough to let him know we were faithful of the SSPX resistance.  I knew that the Campos priest had compromised and made a deal with the Vatican, but I assumed they continued a somewhat traditional approach that probably entailed something along the lines of the Hermeneutic of Continuity...that is until well, I took a look at their website.  To my jaw-dropping surprise, there is no mention anywhere on their website of Dom Antônio.  Surely, the Campos priests, who are now formed in the Apostolic Administration St. John Marie Vianney, which reports directly to Rome, would not even exist if not for the anti-modernist efforts of Dom Antônio.  Have they forgotten where they come from?  Certainly they have as the bishop which replaced the deceased Bishop Rangel has now made such comments as "I'm in the other Mass too" and participated in liturgical abuses.  In response to the traditionalists asking about this new orientation of the Campos bishop Dom Rifan regarding the con-celebration of a new Mass (video here), his response was that he only pretended to co-consecrate, an objective mortal sin.  As if this wasn't enough, Fr. Gaspar Pelegrini commented on the incident accusing all traditionalists of schism who refuse to participate in the novus ordo mass.

"No one can be Catholic while remaining in an attitude of refusal of communion with the Pope and with the Catholic episcopate. In fact, the Church defines as schismatic those who refuse to submit to the Roman Pontiff or to remain in communion with the other members of the Church who are his subjects (canon 751). Now, to refuse continually and explicitly to participate in every and any Mass in the rite celebrated by the Pope and by all the bishops of the Church while judging this rite, in itself, incompatible with the Faith, or sinful, represents a formal refusal of communion with the Pope and with the Catholic episcopate." (source in English and Portuguese)

I guess this explains why the faithful in his church, faithful confirmed by Dom Antônio, feel obligated to inform strangers that they have been to the new mass.

As I stated, there is not one mention of Dom Antônio on the Campos priest's website.  How could they?  There are dozens of Bishop de Castro Mayer's writings to be found on the internet or other places, and they are all thoroughly traditionalist Catholic, many of these have never been translated.  The bulk of these can be viewed on the FSSPX Brasil website. Let's take a look at a rare one I found on a different site which stands in stark contrast to that of Father Gaspar Pelegrini.  

"The Code of Canon Law defines schismatics as the faithful who have separated themselves from the body of the Church, which is made up of the Pope and the bishops in union with him. More directly they are against charity, than against the Faith. Thus, before the First Vatican Council, one would have thought that this referred to someone who held to heresy. A historical example is the act constituted by the "petite église", formed by the bishops and faithful who had not heeded to the decision of Pius VII, when, yielding to the demands of Napoleon, he dismissed all the bishops faithful to the monarchy of Louis XVI. These bishops and faithful did not adhere to any doctrinal error, but did not heed to the Pope's decision. They only had distanced themselves from the Pope and the bishops united with the Pope. It was a schism. It was not a heresy.

"Since the First Vatican Council has defined as a dogma of faith that the Roman Pontiff has in the Church, the supreme power of jurisdiction over bishops and faithful, there is no possibility of a schism forming that is not also heresy, which does not reject one truth of faith.

"However, as does heresy, schism, in general, also involves doctrinal disagreement. That's what we mean when we talk about the St. Hippolytus schism in the third century, when the Saint refused to accept the authority of the Pope Saint Callistus. Schism, then could set up a body of doctrine that would pose as a doctrinal lot of the Church, and that, in fact, turns away the purity and integrity of the teachings of the Church.

"In the case of Vatican II, this could and should be appointed as schismatic, since it shows that, in its authentic texts, there are deviations from the  teachings of the Church's traditional faith.

"Now similar dissonance was noted even during the Council's work. It is, moreover, of all known as religious freedom, claimed by the council as a natural law, even for those who do not comply with the duty to investigate the true religion. In other words, the Council admits that such a right is recognized by all states. This teaching of Vatican II is diametrically opposed to the traditional doctrine, renewed by Pius IX in his encyclical 'Quanta Cura'.

"This is one example. There is much more.

"Given this schismatic position of Vatican II, the good of souls requires the absolute need to discard it before taking care of any others that may arise. Incidentally, the Vatican 2 Council must not be presented as a council of the Catholic Church." (source)

Quite the contrast between these two ideas of schism as noted by Fr. Gaspar Pelegrini and explained by Dom Antônio de Castro Mayer.  It makes one wonder how Fr. Gaspar Pelegrini could have arrived at this point and swallowed the Council, mass and all.  Especially given the fact that he was ordained without the permission of modernist Rome by a bishop

Ordination of Fr. Pelegrini without permission from the modernists.

"excommunicated" from the conciliar church being assisted by Fr. Thomas Aquinas, one of the fiercest resistance priests in South America.  How has this once traditional Campos priest given in to the trappings of modernist Rome and now made friends with the novus ordo clergy and participated in their novus ordo Mass?  Is this what happens to all the groups that make a deal with the Vatican?  Now we have a new generation of pseudo-trads accusing the original traditionalists of "schism"?  Dom Antônio must be rolling over in his grave.  As if this wasn't enough, I must add that the Campos priests have completely lost their minds!  Perhaps Fr. Pelegrini hopes to become the next bishop in any event of a future consecration in Campos.  I would be willing to bet that they have received their last bishop. 

During a Novus Ordo, Fr. Pelegrini.

Fr. Gaspar Pelegrini on the right.

I mentioned already that their website does not even do the favor of mentioning Bishop de Castro Mayer.  I think they realized that people would be curious and google it to find out the Truth and be led into, gasp, "schism".  But let's take a look at some of the interesting stuff (or trash) on their website.  It is no secret that they now proclaim John Paul 2 a saint in their sermons, but what do they say about Francis?  Well, Fr. Gaspar Pelegrini, for one, writes and uploads poems dedicated to Francis for all to read on the official Apostolic Administration website.  Apparently, he is deluded or in denial.  I have undergone the agony of translating this here for English readers. (to see the version with my added images in Portuguese that I have uploaded here; you can use the page translator, maybe, to see the corresponding parts of Fr. Pelegrini's poem).  Here is the English version.

Today I want to join my voice to that of so many people to thank God for the first year of the pontificate of Pope Francis. 

But who is Francis? 

Francis is a gift for the Church today. 

Francis is the "result" of the prayer of millions of Catholics who a year ago asked God for a new Pope according to the Heart of Christ. 

Francis was the consolation of God, after the shock we took with the announcement that our beloved Benedict XVI would resign. 

Francis is proof that Benedict XVI acted driven by God when he decided to resign. Benedict now lives assured that he sees that the Church continues in good hands. 

Francis is the Pope who speaks more with gestures than with words. 

Francis is a constant preaching, which reminds us that we often get lost in superfluous things. 

Francis is synonymous with going out of oneself, to meet each other, to go to the existential peripheries. 

Francis is synonymous with joy of the Gospel, lived in a radical way, preached with clarity and depth. 

Francis is the supreme Pastor of a Church of open doors, with confessionals working, a church that is a mother and not a warehouse of Sacraments. 

Francis is an antidote to pessimism, defeatism, Lenten seasons without Easter, and sour faces ... 

Francis is a scourge against gossip, bad judgments, careerism, exhibitionism. 

Francis wants pastors not employee priests. 

Francis wants mercy, not hardliners or lax priests. 

Francis is an echo of mercy, compassion, kindness. 

Francis is a cry against worldliness, inside and outside the Church. 

Francis is a scourge against the idolatry of money and power. 

Francis is bothered and feels offended when they present him ideologized, misrepresented. 

                                                                                                                

Francis is the face that Christ wants today for His Church. 

Francis, finally, is the image of Christ the Good Shepherd who loves us, knows us, and gives little by little his life for us. 

So today we say : Lord , thank you for everything you have given us , when you gave us Francis. 
(official site of the Apostolic Administration)

I had the opportunity of entering into contact with a few people who live in Campos, besides those parishioners that we spoke to in São Fidelis.  In Campos, the capital of the diocese, there are several churches and a cathedral used by the Campos priests and its bishop which were built by mostly peasants. Here is what an elderly lady who lives in Campos and was confirmed by Dom Antônio commented to me saying about changes in the diocese since the deal with Rome:  

"Nosso Herói da Fé , deixou muita saudade ,, mais permanece no nosso coração e em nossas orações , Salve Maria ! Quanto ao que Dom Antônio nos ensinou a respeito da Tradição da Santa Igreja ,Ainda existe .Eu mesma sigo o que Dom Antônio ensinou , para mim nada mudou ,o que mudou foi algumas pessoas , porque Deus não muda ,,,"

"Our hero of the Faith [Bishop de Castro Mayer] left us missing him very much, but he remains in our hearts and our prayers. Salve Maria!  Regarding what Bishop de Castro Mayer taught us about the Tradition of the Holy Church.  It still exists.  I myself follow what Dom Antônio taught, for me nothing has changed, some people are what has changed because God does not change..."

And here is what another, younger parishioner, had to say about the presence of the SSPX in the seat of the diocese: 

"...procuro quando assisto [a missa nova], participar de missas que sei que o padre não comete abusos (...) Bem. Pelo que sei está sendo [missa da FSSP] em uma casa... mas o pessoal que segue a fraternidade aqui, nao gosta muito de administração apostólica e as vezes ofende o nosso Bispo dom Fernando. As vezes com palavras ásperas."

"when I attend a [new mass], I try to participate in masses that I know that the priest does not commit abuses (...) Well. From what I know they are having [ mass from the SSPX] in a house...but the people that follow the SSPX here, don't like the Apostolic Administration and sometimes they offend our bishop. Sometimes with rude words."

There is hope, however, for the laity of the diocese of Campos.  Not all of them are blinded by Bishop Rifan and his new orientation as we already saw.  Let's take a look at the comments of Fr. Thomas Aquinas OSB regarding the laity.

"All believers have accepted the agreements, deceived by their priests who, in turn, deceived themselves. Actually not all believers have accepted these agreements, but those who resisted were truly the "pusillus grex." Among them, it is worth mentioning here Mr. Hirley Nelson de Souza.

Bishop Rangel, attacked by cancer, died shortly after that, and the Rev. Fr. Rifan succeeded him as head of Apostolic Administration, founded after the agreements with Rome. Consecrated by Cardinal Hoyos, Fr. Rifan will turn out to be the "ralié" par excellence. By becoming friends of our enemies, he would visit all dioceses, embracing those who once he attacked with an ardor that progressives will not soon forget. With the change of side, Bishop Rifan will accumulate the evidence of the sincerity of his "alignment". As Abel Bonnard said: "A 'ralié' is never sufficiently 'ralié'". The authority of Vatican II, the legitimacy of the new Mass, the obligation to submit to the "living magisterium" of the liberal popes; condemnation of Archbishop Lefebvre, considered a schismatic: Bishop Rifan was required to accept and proclaim all of that.

However, this was not what the priests of Campos wanted, nor what they had said to the faithful, not even what they had hinted to Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos. Proof of it is that they drafted a declaration, in which they affirmed their determination to continue the fight against liberalism, modernism and progressivism that inspired Vatican II. Cardinal Hoyos, after reading the statement, made the following reflection that one of the priests of Campos told me: 'Yes, that's what we agreed. But it is needless to say all this. Simply state that you will allow constructive criticism in compliance with the Code of Canon Law.' 'After that, he said to the same priest, our fight is over.' Either by being afraid to grieve for the Pope or Cardinal Hoyos, or due to lack of conviction or because of a shaken faith, or fear of Bishop Rifan, or for any other reason, the fact is that Campos became like a silent dog. The Modernist Rome has nothing to fear from those priests, despite them having been educated in the school of one of the greatest bishops of the twentieth century, who strongly opposed to modern errors. How to explain this? Without wanting to get into the hearts and to go beyond what the facts reveal, I think, certainly, the contact with the authorities who do not profess the integrity of the Catholic faith can only lead, little by little, those who submit to them, to share their ideas and their way of being. Archbishop Lefebvre warned enough about

it to Fr. Gérard. In Rome, you do not do what you want, but what Rome wants. Fr. Gérard did not take that into account; Bishop Rifan, even less.

But the reaction would come from the diocese. The faithful themselves realized over the time that something was changing. They appealed to the monastery, and Fr. Antonio-Maria prayed a Mass for them on a farm that has the beautiful name of Santa Fé (Holy Faith). Bishop Rifan was furious. He gathered the "guilty" and warned them hard.

- 'Woe to you, if you bring a priest from the monastery or the SSPX here again!'

- 'Sir, replied a peasant who knew Bishop de Castro Mayer, it depends only on you. If you persevere in that new chosen direction, I will call a priest of the Society or the monastery to make my Easter, for me and my family, every year. '

Bishop Rifan could not get anything from those brave peasants, who currently are more than 250 in the big feasts in a small church built by themselves, where the priests of Apostolic Administration do not set their feet any longer." (entire letter of Fr. Thomas Aquinas here)

Built by Campos peasants dedicated to the SSPX

Apparently there have been little communities of faithful repelled by Bishop Rifan's new orientation and they had called on the SSPX priests to help resist.  With that same spirit, they have been erecting new chapels.  It seems that they are the most marginalized in the seat of Campos where they must attend Mass in someone's home, while the apostolic administration enjoys a comfortable cathedral.  In a region called Varre Sai they had resistedthe new orientation and were supposedly falsely accused publicly by one of the Campos priests, Fr. Jonas Lisboa, of invading and usurping the Apostolic Administration's chapels.  Apparently, a different Campos priest was prohibited by Bishop Rifan from offering Mass on an altar he himself built and obeyed because the Society priests were now offering Mass in the chapel. (source)

City of Bom Jesus, 35,000 inhabitants, SSPX chapel.

Last year, the SSPX also happened to gain about two hundred faithful in a city called Bom Jesus Itabapoana where the Catholic tradition had been strong due to Bishop de Castro Mayer.  It is also part of the Campos diocese.  The city has only 35,000 inhabitants.  They now have a beautiful, large chapel built and dedicated to the Society by peasants. (Correction: it is a priory!) We are talking about a decent sized SSPX chapel "in the sticks" of the tropical countryside in Brazil.  Contrast this with a large city like Corpus Christi, Texas where the Society is still having Masses in hotel conference rooms.

Let us now end with a quote from the book the "Mouth of the Lion" by Dr. David Allen White on the history of the Campos priests.

Fr. Rifan, today Bishop Rifan, (the new bishop of Campos who pretends to con-celebrate the New Mass) upon being expelled from his church by the modernist bishop Navarro:

"Today, we are not abandoning our struggle; we are being expelled by a judicial decision and we are transferring to a 'parish-in-exile'…. Those responsible for the implantation of progressivism in this church will be the same ones who will profane this temple by a lack of respect, by the presence of indecent clothes, by the new Mass. They may introduce progressivism by force into this church, but later they will answer to God, in the hour of in judgment…. Our work will continue, with all your help, in the slums. This is a historic day, and we will not leave in defeat. One day we will all give account and we will know in heaven that we are the victors."

Requests of the Faithful: determining the state of necessity. The Archbishop Speaks

Remarks with Respect to the New Bishop
to Succeed His Excellency Bishop de Castro Mayer

Precision seems to me very important in the solution of the problems of jurisdiction of the new bishop with respect to his priests and faithful.

First of all, it must be noted that his situation is not exactly the same as that of Bishop de Castro Mayer. This latter is Bishop Emeritus of Campos, after having been its residential bishop. Hence, one could conclude that he kept, if not a juridical power, at least a moral power, which given the present circumstances, could justify a pastoral action with respect to his former priests and faithful.

This is not the case with the new bishop, who has no other basis for jurisdiction than that which comes from the requests of the priests and the faithful to take care of their souls and those of their children, and who have asked him to accept the episcopacy so as to give them true Catholic priests and the grace of the Sacrament of Confirmation. Thus it is clear that the jurisdiction of the new bishop is not territorial but personal, as becomes also the jurisdiction of the priests.

Inasmuch as the faithful request from the priests and the bishop the sacraments and the doctrine of the Faith, the priests and the bishop have the duty to watch over the good reception and good use of doctrine and the grace of the Sacrifice of the Mass and the Sacraments. The faithful cannot request the Sacraments and at the same time refuse the vigilant authority of the priests and the bishop.

In order to watch over the good order of the apostolate and its efficacy, the organization of the Society of the holy Cure of Ars seems very appropriate and ought to reunite obligatorily all the priests who desire to continue the traditional apostolate.

It would seem desirable that the bishop, once consecrated, be named president of the presbyteral council for life, in order that he might hold an authority, which is indispensable for the nomination of priests, for new foundations, for inter-parish activities, for the seminary and religious societies.

Since the jurisdictional authority of the bishop does not come from a Roman nomination, but from the necessity of the salvation of souls, he will have to exercise it with a special delicacy and taking special account of his presbyteral council.

Moreover, the faithful and priests must acknowledge the grace of having a pastor, successor of the Apostles, and guardian of Tradition of the deposit of the Faith, of the eucharistic Sacrifice, of the Catholic priesthood and of the grace of the Sacraments, and they must consequently facilitate the exercise of his authority by a generous obedience.

Since the jurisdiction of the bishop is not territorial but personal and has as its source the duty of the faithful to save their souls, if a group of faithful in the diocese calls upon the bishop to have a priest, this group gives by this very fact, authority to the bishop to watch over the transmission of the Faith and of grace in this group, by the intermediary of the priest that he sent.

Thus, so it seems to me, will be resolved in an order, which is in conformity to the spirit of the Church, the delicate problems which come from an episcopal consecration without the explicit mandate of Rome but with the implicit mandate of the Roman Church, Guardian of the Faith.

The new bishop remains the ontological link with the Church, faithful to its Divine Spouse, Our Lord Jesus Christ.

+ Marcel Lefebvre

February 20, 1991

_________________________________________________________

source

Help the Holy Cross Monastery with the expenses of the Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Faure

HELP THE MONASTERY OF THE HOLY CROSS WITH THE COSTS OF THE EPISCOPAL CONSECRATION OF REV. FATHER JEAN MICHEL FAURE.-

Dear friends,
As we all know, in the near future the Rev. Father Christian Jean-Michel Faure will be consecrated bishop by His Excellency Bishop Richard Nelson Williamson at the Monastery of the Holy Cross of the Benedictines in Brazil. We ask for charity towards the cost of the ceremony.

Published below the Monastery's Paypal.

We thank you in advance. May God reward you graciously.


Link to donate site here:   http://www.beneditinos.org.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=74&Itemid=104#to_help_us_in_dollars

In Spanish here.

Para nos ajudar

Pour nous aider

To help us in dollars

To help us in pounds

Bancos no Brasil

Banque en France 

Banque en Suisse

Bank in der Schweiz

Bank in Deutschland

 

Faites un don en Euros

 

Make your donation in dollars

 

Donate in Pounds

The Unholy Way of the Cross of the Brazilian Bishops

The Way of the Cross of the National Conference of Brazilian Bishops and the Fraternity Campaign

Via Sacra CNBB 2015
This year as part of the Fraternity (Equality and Liberty) Campaign  as propaganda for the Liberation of Theology and Masonic doctrine of CNBB (conferencia nacional de bispos brasileiros), a "Way of the Cross' version corresponding to the Fraternity Campaign was sent to parishes in the Brazilian dioceses. I would like to make a brief comparison of the "Way to blaspheme the Cross" of the CNBB with the Via Crucis of the great Bishop of Campos, Bishop Antonio de Castro. It seems interesting that in many ways they are opposing and contradictory.

At first we receive a presentation from the conciliar Bishop Auxiliary of Brasilia, Leonardo Ulrich Steiner. He starts trying to explain what Lent is without making any reference to sin, penance, soul, salvation, hell, and Judgment. He briefly talks about fasting as a way to be "reintegrated" and with a bit of emphasis on the resurrection. In the following pages of the presentation he focuses on the Church in society to point of ambiguously defining the Church and Christians as well:. "The Church, communities of faith, Christians are active in society They, through dialogue and charity, care for people who are excluded from society. " I wonder, after reading this definition, who are those people "excluded from society". Ahh but we should meditate on the poor oppressed who are gays wanting to marry he means? Was he referring to drug addicts walking in all the Brazilian neighborhoods openly smoking pot in front of society? If he is a little more specific, maybe I would know who those "excluded from society" are so that I may rush off and take care of them. Needless to say, it was not possible for him to give this presentation without citing three times what he said is the "conciliar document, Lumen Gentium" and one other time the joy of the Gospel which is the heretical Exhortation Evangelii Guadium of Francisco. Notably, it is a recurring theme of JOY and HOPE and JOY of this "Way of the Cross" that the CNBB is pumping into the little that is Catholic in the dioceses. As you'll see, these modernists understand very well the law of prayer that says "lex orandi, lex credendi est", we believe as we pray and not the contrary. What we pray and profess is what we believe. This is how they are choking the faith out of Brazil.

Just like everything is a celebration and party for the modernists, they decided to give this "Way of the Cross" the title "Celebration of the Way of the Cross" (page 7). Those who celebrated the Way of the Cross of the Lord were those who crucified him. Ingenuous this name. The beginning starts reminding the Lord that the Church is the "servant of humanity" rather than what we pray every day in the Angelus: Ecce ancilla Domini! Sweet words of the Virgin, "Behold the handmaid of the Lord." But the conciliar church is the servant of humanity, and in other terms the slave of world government as well as its members will come to be. "Still begging the Lord for the fruits of righteousness in our society, and that we become builders of the fraternal society" so begins the Fraternity campaign Anthem of 2015 with a first citation from Gaudium et Spes (Joy and Hope n. 2). Complementing the hymn with the refrain in line with the TL and Francisco:
"I want a united Church,
  server and missionary
  that announces and learns to listen.
  The fight for dignity,
  For justice and equality,
  because "I came to serve"

(The Brazilian Conference of Bishops initiate a Fraternity campaign every year to spread Marxism in the dioceses and manipulate catholic voters to vote for pro-Marxist agendas.)

(I want) What part of the Way of the Cross comes to what 'I want'? The fight for dignity. Human dignity has all emphases in this corner. Nothing to do with God. Equality, teaches us that we need to fight for equality. I do not think I need to explain the nonsense with this hymn. The chorus ends with the motto of Fraternity campaign "I came to serve," serve humanity is the meaning of the words and  they do not hide this fact. Best we take a peek at the start of the Cross written by Bishop de Castro Mayer, a true Way of the Cross.

                                                           The Lion of Campos

The Via Crucis of Bishop De Castro Mayer here

"PREPARATORY PRAYER My Lord Jesus Christ, I dispose myself to follow Thee in the path Thou took in the judgment hall of Pilate to Calvary, to Thee immolated for my salvation. I beg the grace to grant me great pain and regret of having sinned, causing Thy atrocious suffering, and that Thy precious Blood is infused in my soul with the firm intention never to sin. "

The rest of the hymn of the version of the "Via Crucis" of the Fraternity Campaign speaks only more dribble: 2. "The great ones oppress, exploit the people, but among you, you must be more diverse." The struggle between the classes. Marxism! A phrase that explains well the objective of the the Unholy way of the Cross of the CNBB. Just think of the people and promote diversity as the only commandment! Being diverse we say. Nothing about our sins! Whoever has taken a sociology course in a secular university knows that "diversity" refers to gays and transvestites. Instead of trying to console God for our sins on the Cross, the CNBB wrote a version to cause the people to "serve humanity" and "be diverse". Diabolical! The singing only continues talking about "the wounds of hatred and intolerance" and "I want" a Church with an "open door without fear of love!" Not a word about the Way of the Cross of the Lord taking His cross. Not a word about the passion of our Lord. With only 2 sentences Don Antonio managed to place us mentally in the way of the cross and be sorry for our sins, and compared to the above 2 page hymn of the CNBB version it is just the opposite.

1st Station
Jesus is arrested and sentenced to death.
After reading about the agony in the garden with emphases in fraternal love the director asks us to understand "to built on brotherhood and peace" and to give a sensitive heart summoning all to ask of the Father that we are a "living Church, fraternal of witnesses".

The Via Crucis of Bishop de Castro Mayer starts without innovation with Jesus in the presence of Pilate.. "Yielding to the cries of the Jews, Pilate condemned Jesus to death on the Cross. What led the Jews to ask the death of Jesus Christ was their infidelity and they wanted to follow a religion to their liking, and not the religion revealed by the Son of God made man. In this they imitated Adam's disobedience and rejection of God's will. We are in the same miserable condition. Let us humble ourselves and ask Our Lady to obtain the grace of being faithful to the Holy Will of her Divine Son. "

With undiluted Catholic doctrine, Bishop de Castro Mayer explains how the Jews reject our Lord because they wanted to follow a religion to their liking. We remember the cries of the CNBB repeating "I want a church" so unhappy with the Catholic Tradition! Bishop de Castro Mayer reminds us of original sin and all our miserable condition instead of "dignity" and moves us to humble ourselves.

Instead of praying for brotherhood, equality, and freedom, as does the "Via non Crucis" of the CNBB, the Via Crucis of Bishop de Castro Mayer harmoniously ends each time with an act of contrition and a prayer for the faithful departed.

2nd Station
Jesus Carries The Cross
After reading briefly about Pilate and the people asking Jesus to be crucified and Pilate saying that he is innocent of that  blood, lector 2 says: "A society in which millions of people are excluded, without the goods necessary for life; a society that produces every day new poor and miserable and kill the innocent, also becomes responsible for their blood. " This Way of the Cross is having the parish meditate on people, eliminating all it has to do with the Catholic religion. Then the lector asks that no one is excluded from society because we all have "equal dignity". This same "dignity" that asked that his blood fall upon us. This "Way of the Cross" is about us! Poor us! And all end up praying for the people who "carry the cross of inequality." We pray contemplating the lack of jobs in this Way of the Cross, but this is just beginning.

Bishop de Castro Mayer reminds us that Jesus carries the Cross on His Shoulders:. "After waking in the Garden of Olives and the atrocious flogging, Jesus still submits to sacrifice to carry the cross to Calvary, Jesus did this to repair our sins. Learn that without sacrifice and the usual spirit of mortification, our religion is vain, empty, without merit. Let us ask Our Lady for the grace to accept with joy the mortifications which require us to comply with our duties of state. "

3rd Station
Jesus Falls the First Time
After reading two sentences on the first fall of Jesus, lector 2 starts again with off things of "without considering our neighbor ... there will be no social peace, no true respect for authentic human values." Increasingly it seems that the CNBB is obsessed with "human values". The director continues, "let us go in search of dignity, for justice, and equality." The Via Crucis of the CNBB is anything but a search for God, it is a search for us and what we want, it is a search for the pity of us and social peace, humanity and everything to do with the worship of man instead of God. All are required to pray that "we are a Samaritan Church to homeless and the marginalized of society." Poor us!

Now a dose of sanity from Bishop de Castro Mayer: "Have been exhausted by insomnia, hunger and loss of blood, Jesus succumbs to the weight of the cross and falls to the ground. In the design of God, this fall is to discount the offenses of our sins, and. warn us against our assumption. By ourselves we will only go from sin to sin, drop in fall. Let us ask Our Lady to obtain the grace of vigilance in prayer and escape from the occasions of sin. "

And here we have the "Via  non Sacra" of the CNBB complaining about the lack of human respect and the marginalized of society and the Bishop de Castro Mayer version reminding us of our sins that cause the fall of Jesus to warn us against our assumption.

4th Station
Jesus meets his mother.
After reading a bit about the prophecy of Simeon and lector 2 humanizing the sufferings of our Lord, the director starts talking about mothers who "suffer with their children in health care, with poor education, lack of qualification for work, with drugs and violence." Dear Catholics in the dioceses, throw this "Way of the Cross of the CNBB" in the trash, burn it as reparation, and pray a Via Crucis that is worth it, for the love of God, and not for the love of humanity!

Bishop de Castro Mayer:. "In Agony in the Garden of Gethsemani and the infamous process that her Divine Son has undergone, Mary was absent, But when He consummates the sacrifice of the redemption of the world, she is there. For both Jesus and Mary, in the decrees of the Almighty, they are identified as active in man's redemptive mission. It is in this way that the Mother of the redeemed, Mary, cooperates in the work of salvation. It is for the Mother who we have recourse to, in order to remain faithful to her Divine Son, in the midst of a paganized society that surrounds us. "

Again although the CNBB does not like it, "It is this this Mother who we have recourse to, in order to remain faithful to her Divine Son, in the midst of a paganized society that surrounds us."

5th Station
Simon the Cyrene helps Jesus carry the Cross
The fifth station begins more or less well and to the end that starts off on the tone of "the weight of the cross of illness and violence" what really are the results of sin, sin, a word that not once appears in this booklet of the " Celebration of the Cross ". It continues with more Marxist trash: "In society in which the great oppress and exploit the people, make that the Church is the protection of the poor and victims of injustice." It is conflict between classes which this Fraternity (equality and liberty) Campaign promotes.

Pius XI advises us about this doctrine of Marxists in the encyclical Divini Redemptoris (9): "... According to this doctrine there is in the world only one reality, matter, the blind forces of which evolve into plant, animal and man. Even human society is nothing but a phenomenon and form of matter, evolving in the same way. By a law of inexorable necessity and through a perpetual conflict of forces, matter moves towards the final synthesis of a classless society. In such a doctrine, as is evident, there is no room for the idea of God; there is no difference between matter and spirit, between soul and body; there is neither survival of the soul after death nor any hope in a future life. Insisting on the dialectical aspect of their materialism, the Communists claim that the conflict which carries the world towards its final synthesis can be accelerated by man. Hence they endeavor to sharpen the antagonisms which arise between the various classes of society. Thus the class struggle with its consequent violent hate and destruction takes on the aspects of a crusade for the progress of humanity. On the other hand, all other forces whatever, as long as they resist such systematic violence, must be annihilated as hostile to the human race. "

And now the Lion of Campos: "In the near future, on the way to Calvary, the executioners of the Savior convince themselves that the extreme weakness, a result of the torture he had been subjected to, Jesus Christ was not able to carru His cross to the top of the hill. They forced Simon of Cyrene to carry the cross of the Savior. Our salvation by God's will does not take place without our cooperation. We need, in our way, to help Jesus to carry the cross. And we do this when we do not conform ourselves to the ways to of a society that, in practice, has went wayward from the Christian austerity. May Our Lady grant us this grace. "

Let me give you a bit of emphasis on this last sentence, "And we do this when we do not conform to the ways of a society that, in practice, has went wayward from the Christian austerity." If our dear bishop of Campos were only alive today. If he could be with us in these dark times!

6th station
Veronica wipes the face of Jesus
After some reading and a quote from "Gaudium et Spes", the lector asks God to renew the Church by placing emphasis on people with "faces disfigured by hatred and intolerance of our time" and calls everyone to pray that "we are a fraternal Church" again. Just loving the oppressed people.

Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer: "From the middle of that sadistic crowd that formed the nefarious entourage, the Savior on the road to Calvary, there is a strong woman, braving the arrogance of the soldiers, she approaches Jesus and wipes the sacred Face with a clean towel, disfigured by the blood of the crown of thorns, the spit of the assassins of the Sanhedrin and the slaps of bestial soldiery. Let us the ashamed admire the fortitude of this woman and ask Our Lady to obtain the grace to never betray, by human respect, our religion, with our conduct."

7th station
Jesus falls the second time
Here the reader 2 ensures us that "the kingdom that Jesus announces and invites human beings to participate in is the kingdom of love, life and justice, not corruption, exploitation, abuse of power and strength. When there is not respect for the human person and that they are treated as income of merchandise, a fall is inevitable. Is there a worse fall than this? The daily path of the cross is hard and painful. Even so, the cross of our mission should not be abandoned. "

I honestly can not believe what I just read. The words soul, eternity, salvation, hell and heaven are missing from the "Via non Sacra" of the CNBB but not only that, now we are saying that the kingdom of the Lord is something to the worldly. Of all falls, we are asked rhetorically, is there a worse fall than the lack of respect to people? Yes I answer! There is! There is a fall to mortal sin when we lose our soul and our salvation of the Lord, the same fall into sin which is a cause of the fall of our Lord on the way to Calvary! What beasts these bishops of the CNBB taking the Lord's meditation to only reflect on the people asking us if there is worse fall than lack of respect for a human. Blasphemy! The lack of respect in the parishes to the Body, Soul, Blood and Divinity of Our Lord in the abuse of the liturgy that all Brazilians know happens often! The lack of respect for God. The lack of respect for the holy! These apostates do not deserve to occupy the position they occupy in the Holy Church! How can they? Worse than this fall? Yes, there is no shame!

Whoever wrote and had published this garbage has neither a small fraction of dignity and respect to God that the bishop of Campos had. "Despite the help of Cyrene, the enormous weakness of the Savior caused him to fall a second time on the way to Calvary. This second fall of the Savior reminds us of our repeated sins and on the other hand, the infinite mercy of God, that our only hope is repentance to bring us back. That the weakness of the Redeemer that fell to the ground, is our strength, and does not allow us to accept a half-Catholicism to taste sensuality, made more of falls than virtues. "

Not even half-Catholicism does the CNBB have. The CNBB has zero Catholicism.

I will not be able to finish this comparison of the Unholy Way of the Cross of CNBB. It only causes the people to meditate in conflict between classes, humanism, materialism, and liberation theology. There are plenty of other things that can be said about the of the CNBB's Way to blaspheme the Cross, it attacks the personal faith of the people and is a danger in the dioceses. In my opinion the Via Crucis of Don Antonio de Castro Mayer is perfect (if you know Portuguese or get a translation). You can read it here or elsewhere on the web and print it for use during Lent. Anything would be better than the "Via non Sacra" of the CNBB. Get that garbage out of the parishes for the love of God. Saint Francis of Asissi also has a version that is great and there are others that are good.