The American College of Pediatricians speaks up about the issue of Gender Ideology.

The American College of Pediatricians has posted a timeless article on their site defending children against the social ill of Gender Ideology. I admire these brave doctors for the public stance they have taken on an issue that seems to be causing constant controversy.

Gender Ideology Harms Children

Originally posted March 21, 2016 – a temporary statement with references. A full statement will be published in summer 2016. Updated with Clarifications on April 6, 2016.

The American College of Pediatricians urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality.

1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sex development (DSDs), including but not limited to testicular feminization and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.1

2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one. No one is born with an awareness of themselves as male or female; this awareness develops over time and, like all developmental processes, may be derailed by a child’s subjective perceptions, relationships, and adverse experiences from infancy forward. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women.2,3,4

3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V).5 The psychodynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved.2,4,5

4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty- blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child.6

5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.5

6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer.7,8,9,10

7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT – affirming countries.11 What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?

8. Conditioning children into believing that a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

Michelle A. Cretella, M.D.
President of the American College of Pediatricians

Quentin Van Meter, M.D.
Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians
Pediatric Endocrinologist

Paul McHugh, M.D.
University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School and the former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital

Check out the entire article here with notes and clarifications.

Family Forum: Gender Ideology

GENDER IDEOLOGY

At the beginning of the 21st century, we are challenged, perhaps without realizing how important it is, by one of the most influential cultural manifestations of our time, a manifestation which has clearly negative repercussions on the family and on the whole of our society: Gender Ideology.

IDEOLOGIES
Ideologies were unknown until the end of the 19th century. The course of history has seen the development of ideas, philosophical theories, and intellectual constructions, but not ideologies. An ideology, as a modern phenomenon, is an all-embracing and closed system of thought, which, on the basis of some very simple principles, gives a complete vision of man, society, history and all the events of everyday life. Moreover, once its principles are accepted, it is coherent in itself. If the premises of an ideology are accepted, the whole construction becomes logical and coherent. It is necessary to step outside it to see the inconsistencies. If one were to share the prejudices of Hitler in respect of morality, history and the roles of the Arians and the Jews, it becomes logical to exterminate millions of innocent Jews. If one shares Marx’s views on class struggle, it is easy to understand the 50 million deaths during the soviet regime.

IDEOLOGICAL CONFRONTATION
In our day and age there continues to be a worldwide ideological confrontation, which is as omnipresent as that which existed between Marxism and freedom in the 20th century. Today’s confrontation is between, one the one hand, a conception of the person and society inspired, albeit vaguely, in Western humanism, and on the other Gender Ideology. We are talking here of two closed and all-embracing systems, which are alternative and noncommunicable.

We do not normally perceive this ideological struggle as such, because many the those who live by traditional Western cultural standards are simply not aware of it; and because many of those who defend gender ideology disguise the fact that their approach is ideological, and they present their ideas as individual initiatives in the defence of rights: the right of women to abort, the right to homosexual marriage, the right of transsexuals to appear as such in the civil registry. What is presented as isolated initiatives is in fact the political agenda of a highly structured ideology.

THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT OF THE 60s
Gender ideology was born from the American feminist movement at the end of the 1960s, when a group of women began to criticize the existing feminist movement and to state that there had been a mistake of direction in establishing as their target equality between men and women.
For these new feminists, who styled themselves as gender activists, the objective of women’s liberation would not be achieved by equaling the rights of men and women, but by eliminating the distinction between men and women. These ideologues began to state that there is nothing natural in the distinction between men and women. In their opinion the psychological, social and sexual roles associated with being a man or being a woman are purely  cultural constructions, invented by man in order to “enslave” the female to the service of her “reproductive function”, for man’s benefit , by means of that “oppressive institution” called marriage.  Therefore, if there is no natural, non-cultural difference between man and woman, what must be done to achieve liberation of women is to eradicate, to “deconstruct” – this is the term normally used, taken from structuralist philosophies – all those cultural, religious, legal and linguistic categories which, for centuries, have been used,
according to this ideology, to reinforce the anti-natural distinction between men and women.
They prefer the term “gender” to “sex”, because there are only two sexes. “Gender” is a word taken from linguistics and takes us to the terrain of culture. For them, “gender” is a personal construction which each person freely chooses; this construction is what they call “sexual orientation”.
According to this ideology, each individual independently chooses his or her own sexual orientation, without regard to natural conditioning – they consider there are no natural determining factors as far as sex is concerned; so it is up to each one to construct his/her own identity, his/her sexual orientation. Everything is equally valid: to be heterosexual, transsexual, bisexual or homosexual; your choice is the result of your independence and therefore all are equally valid. It cannot be said any one of these orientations is better than any other.

MOTHERHOOD & MARRIAGE
According to the proponents of gender ideology, what is the only bad thing as far as sexuality is concerned? On the one hand, the thing which, they claim, “condemns” a woman to being a woman; that is, motherhood, which is what makes women physically consecrated as women, and on the other hand, the institution that man invented to enslave women to motherhood, marriage. For this reason, the whole of gender ideology is steeped in phobias about motherhood and marriage. Why is it that under the new law of gender identity transsexuals are allowed to appear in the Civil Registry with the
sex they wish to have, rather than what their chromosomal and morphological makeup indicates? Because I can create my sexual identity as I wish; it does not depend on whether I have an operation or not, whether I add to or remove parts from my body. If I decide, whatever my bodily formation is, that I am a woman, I register as a woman; if I decide I am a man, I am entitled to register as a man. This is the latest idea in gender ideology: I can freely choose my sex, my gender, and moreover I am entitled to recognition of that fact by registering my choice in the Civil Registry. Judith Buttler, one of the proponents of gender ideology who is most widely read in the U.S., often claims that true
liberation lies not only in the independent construction of one’s own sexual orientation, but also in the fact that others recognize you as such. Whatever my body has to say, I am only free when it is I who decide whether I am a man, a woman, or transsexual; and what is more, to enjoy my freedom, I need others to accept my choice and be obliged to treat me as I see myself. For this reason it is so important to eliminate any moral, legal or sociological distinction between men and women;
for liberation to be achieved, it is necessary for others to accept you as you have decided to be.
Perhaps the most precise definition I have found of what gender ideology means is a phrase I read in a work by Joseph Ratzinger when he was still a Cardinal: ”Gender ideology is the ultimate rebellion of the creature against his condition as creature”. He goes on to explain: "modern man, through atheism, has tried to deny the existence of a superior being who has something to say about the truth about man himself, about what is good or bad for him; through materialism, modern man has tried to deny the demands on himself and his freedom, which derive from accepting that he is also part spiritual; and now, with gender ideology, man wishes to liberate himself from the constraints of his own body. Through gender ideology, modern man is an independent being, who constructs
himself, he is pure will who self-creates himself. He has become god for himself."

OMNIPRESENCE 

At the present time and since the beginning of the 1990s, gender ideology is omnipresent in all the agencies of the United Nations The population agencies of the U.N., specifically UNICEF, UNESCO and the WHO, have progressively incorporated into all their documents and distributed throughout the world the categories and terminology which are characteristic of gender ideology. The first time I heard of this ideology, which at that time sounded strange to me, was during the Cairo Summit on Population in 1994. The next time was in Peking in 1995, at the Women’s Summit Conference, organized by the U.N. The conclusions of these two summit conferences triggered a worldwide reaction by Pope John Paul II, precisely in an attempt to prevent the official summit statements from converting into U.N. doctrine the philosophy and terminology of gender ideology. From the United Nations, gender ideology has now reached the European Union, and from there will enter legislation of the different countries, as is the case in Spain at this time. At the present time, gender ideology and pro-abortion go completely hand in hand. This ideology is used by the population agencies of the United Nations as an instrument of birth control. As one of the heads of population policy at the U.N. recently said: today we do not wish to control population in the traditional gender roles; we wish to change those roles in order to control population.

DROWNING EVIL IN AN ABUNDANCE OF GOOD 
Because of the negative consequences for the family and for society which this ideology implies, it is an urgent necessity to begin a cultural battle to counteract its expansion. In the first place, by what we say, by speaking about all the valuable things which fill our lives and our homes, without fear of demonstrating them to our fellow citizens. This is an age that needs not so much teachers as witnesses, people to show others with their own lives how much life is worth living. What is more, in order to be able to convince with solid arguments, it is necessary to be informed, by reading and listening to those who can help us to have clear ideas. This is very important in those spheres in which personal happiness is very much at stake, marriage, family and children. If people see that we are happy, if people see us as people in love with life, as people who are not afraid of what bearing and rearing children means, then our lives will have a positive impact on others. Another way of influencing people positively is by associating; one person, on his own, can do very little in a pluralist society like ours; a lot of people together can do lot more; a lot of people in an association can do very much more. Without doing anything exceptional, we all have great power. If all the people who live normally good lives, defending what is upright, were prepared to assume this aspect of their social responsibility, I truly believe we could bring about radical changes in the world.

Benigno Blanco President 
Spanish Family Forum

PDF

Gender Ideology-Betrayal: Parishes in Brazil at the service of the destruction of the Church

By Catherine Maria B. de Almeida | Fratres In Unum Translation and Commentary by Michael Fuller- 
{Note: Fratres In Unum is a pseudo-traditionalist site which promotes diocesan Masses. They are trad-ecumenist and similar to Michael Voris.  They do a lot of good denouncing the abuses in the conciliar church, but fail to see the real problem.  They have also unwittingly used the language of the sodomite agenda and my comments appear in red.}

According to news published on Monday, the parish of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, the Diocese of São Miguel Paulista - São Paolo, Brazil, presented a set of prayers in its weekly liturgical "Memorial of the Lord" in which they beseeched God for the gay [sodomite] cause.

Faithful from all over Brazil were offended by the prayers, calling for "the offensive, homophobic and hysterical fundamentalists in Congress to be confronted with courage and serenity by the rise of libertarian causes", a clear pledge of allegiance to the LGBT flags.

It is worth noting that at no time did they show themselves to be embarrassed by the scandal to the faithful.  The IPDM Association, "Igreja, Povo de Deus em Movimento-the Church, the People of God in Movement-liberation theology", linked to the parish, even released a statement saying that they had published "the prayer of the faithful made in the Divine Office in celebration of Our Lady of Mount Carmel", but "the parish, the priest and all of the community of believers were subsequently attacked by Catholic fundamentalists"(sic!).

The prayers were authored by Fr. Paulo Sérgio Bezerra, parish priest of that parish and priest of the Diocese of São Miguel Paulista. It is not, however, an isolated offense. The same priest wrote a theological apologetic of homosexuality, published in two parts (here the first and second parts).

The main thesis that he defends is that "'Catholicism and homoaffectivity [a new language term of the sodomite agenda to remove shame and guilt for unnatural attractions]' historically clashed and opposed each other. As a result of this the 'fires of the inquisition' were lit and 'heated debates', mostly producing perpetrators and victims.  Liberation theology proposes to discuss it".

However, this association is not limited to a theoretical defense.  It is also militant and has very clear goals!

Now, in a video [see above] found on the City Council's site in São Paulo, the intentions of this movement are made blatantly public.

One [pro-sodomite] named Eduardo Brasileiro introduced himself in a seminary organized by the LGBT Movement and others, explaining who the Association "Church, the People of God in Movement" are and what they want:

"It is a movement within the Catholic Church that wants to fight for human rights by a refounding of dogma and Catholic conceptions within its power structure. This is not easy, but it has fifteen parishes of São Paolo East Zone who share this idea."

The video is shocking because in addition to nominally confronting the Cardinal/Archbishops of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, the guy praises the blasphemous representation of the crucified transvestite (This occurred in the sodomite pride parade that the diocese of São Paolo strongly supported, see more in my other article on Gender Ideology here. What is stated is praising of the blasphemy and he says that it was a good thing that they committed this blasphemy to show that other people suffer and that there should be more taking of these religious symbols and desecration of them.  It is truly shocking.).

Well, something must be done. And it is urgent !!

This is a tactic used to destroy the Church. To instrumentalize it, infiltrating enemy groups, with the aim of breaking them down gradually from within.

This is the case, for example, of "Catholics for a Free Choice". As was confessed by its founder, Frances Kisslling, the objective of the association was to erode the Catholic morality from within the Church to undermine the anti-abortionist resistance, since Catholic moral theology was the most articulate position and offers sound arguments against the Culture of Death . In the words of Kisslling:

"People in this country have questioned the legality of abortion, but in a way that did not question the issue of morality. Failure to address this issue at the moral level is a serious threat to the long-term success of the movement in favor of abortion. You never really will definitely win if the question of morality is raised. If we, as a movement, we have to deal with morality on abortion, we will lose, because the moral discourse is controlled by men and religion, and is built against women. The argument of the bishops says that abortion is murder, that abortion is murder and that life begins at conception. But it is this Catholic perspective that is the right place where to begin the work, because the Catholic position is the most developed. So, if you can disprove the Catholic position, you have debunked all the others. None of the other religious groups actually have statements as well defined on the personality, when life begins, fetuses, etc. So, if you bring down the Catholic position, you win. "

{Let me quote some more that was not quoted but is important in this context: "Abortion is killing, life begins at conception. They don’t say personhood begins at conception. They themselves would never dare say that. So our job has been to take on this question forthrightly from a Catholic perspective, although you can then extrapolate from the Catholic perspective to other perspectives. You know, the Catholic perspective is a good place to start—in either philosophical, sociological, theological terms—because the Catholic position is the most developed position. So if you can refute the Catholic position, you have refuted everything else. Okay. I mean, none of the other faith groups really have as well-defined statements on personhood, when does life begin, fetuses, et cetera. So by debunking the Catholic position, you win. To go back, for instance, to how do you deal with the ultimate loyalist—so Population and Reproductive Health Oral History Project Sophia Smith 

"I’m out, and I’m making a speech, and always, the end of my speech, you
know, there are always a few people in the audience who are of this Opus Dei
ilk—whether they belong to Opus Dei or not, they’re Opus Dei–ilk Catholics.
And they’ll stand up and they’ll say, This woman has excommunicated herself. Why are you listening to her? She is not a Catholic. You cannot be a Catholic and have this position.

"And my response is actually to turn the loyalty question on its head, so to speak, and I say to them, Look, I’m always fascinated by people like you because you claim to be loyal to the Pope, and that the Pope makes the rules. Now, the Pope and the bishops, my bishop in Washington, D.C., have not said I am not a Catholic. They are the ones who decide who is excommunicated. You don’t get to decide. And if you are so loyal to the Pope and the bishops, how dare you take upon yourself as a lowly lay person the right to say that I am excommunicated. That is not your right. And our bishops and our Pope have, for whatever reasons, decided that excommunicating Catholics who disagree with them on the question of abortion is not what they’re going to do, and I would say they’re not going to do it because they don’t have the right to do it. I am sure it frustrates them, the bishops, that they can’t go out there and excommunicate all of us, because it would just be so easy to end this dissent within the Church by taking that action. But even they, in the service of something they believe so profoundly, will not pervert the structure of the institutional Church and misuse excommunication to deal with this problem. So it shows—if they could excommunicate us, they would do it tomorrow." {You find all of this here. You will see more relevance of this added quote near the end of this article}

This Association "Church, the People of God in Movement" introduces itself with the same purpose: to destroy the Catholic dogma from within, deceiving the people by preaching a false gospel, in open disagreement with the Church's teaching, to promote the agenda of anti-Catholic groups, such as LGBT and other organizations clearly linked to lobbies against life and the family.

The Code of Canon Law [new] says that "who joins an association which plots against the Church is to be punished with a just penalty; however, a person who promotes or directs an association of this kind is to be punished with an interdict" (c. 1374).

But above all, it states that "an apostate from the faith, a heretic or schismatic incurs excommunication latæ sententiæ" (c. 1364), and "by the law itself", that is, without the need of intervention of an ecclesiastical authority, "is removed from office"(c. 194). "The removal" adds the canon "can be enforced only if it is established by the declaration of a competent authority" (c. 194 §2), i.e. only the ecclesiastical authority may apply the material consequences of the loss of office, but the loss itself takes place under the law, regardless of the intervention of the competent authority.

The theological reasons for these canonical determinations are clear if we consider the constant tradition of the Church, exemplified, among other sources, in the Encyclical Mystici Corporis of Pius XII. As taught by the Pontiff, "For not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy". (Pius XII, SS, Encyclical MysticiCorporis, 29.06. 1943, no. 22). In other words, by mortal sin, generally speaking, the Christian loses sanctifying grace, the virtue of charity, all the other virtues and gifts of the Holy Spirit, but he will continue with the virtue of faith. It remains dead, and he himself will become a dead member of the Church, nevertheless, a member of the Mystical Body of Christ, even though a dead member.

But when someone sins against faith, falling into heresy [formal heresy], they lose the virtue of faith and are no longer a member of the Mystical Body of Christ. He is no longer even a dead member of the Church; he no longer is part of it, and neither is he Christian. Obviously, if someone no longer belongs to the Church, one cannot be understood to exercise an office in which one would govern over others in the faith. With assistance from the competent authority or without it, you have the loss of office even if only by the law itself.  For the authority, the only thing done is to legally require the material consequences of the loss, as the physical removal of office and replacement.

Applying this to the current case, Father Paulo Sergio Bezerra is blatantly in conscious heresy, putting himself in frank disagreement with Sacred Scripture and the teaching of the Church, which consider homosexuality a grave sin; He is automatically excommunicated and loses ipso facto his ecclesiastical office and his condition as member of the Church.

And this Association also conspiring against the Church, must be denounced and suppressed.  Its members should be urged to rectify their position and in the case of adhereing to them,  their excommunication must also be declared because of their blatant heresy. [It almost seems that the Fratres In Unum blog, which makes a big deal about official, conciliar recognition, has left out this important quote from the subversives that I included regarding how the question of authority is actually being used against Catholics who demand adherence to doctrine.  This is because Fratres in Unum takes the middle ground, excommunicating liberals and modernists and claiming that traditionalists are disobedient.  They want their cake and to be able to eat it too.  It's time that they learned that the "loyal to the pope flavor of traditionalists" crowd can't have it both ways.  Don't expect them to wake up though. Bishop Rifan will just say something conservative soon to pacify them.]

The Catholic faithful have a duty to report these usurpers to the ecclesiastical authorities, which have a duty to intervene, applying the law of the Church.       [Where have they been?  The authorities of the Church have been accomplices for the last 40 years.  These guys are deluded by their neo-conservatice, conciliar trad views.]

As taught by St. Thomas, the faithful must not use tolerance toward those who teach in the Church and spread errors against the faith, and for that reason no longer belong to it. "When there is danger to the faith", says St. Thomas,

"It must be observed, however, that if the faith were endangered, a subject ought to rebuke his prelate even publicly. Hence Paul, who was Peter's subject, rebuked him in public, on account of the imminent danger of scandal concerning faith, and, as the gloss of Augustine says on Gal. 2:11, 'Peter gave an example to superiors, that if at any time they should happen to stray from the straight path, they should not disdain to be reproved by their subjects.' (Thomas Aquinas, S., Summa Theologica, IIa-IIæ, q . 33, a. 4, ad 1um)." [Ok, but we've been saying this for decades.]

Write to the Bishop of San Miguel Paulista, the Apostolic Nuncio in Brazil and the dicasteries of the Roman Curia requiring immediate intervention for this very serious problem. The Catholic people are tired of these impostors. [I did not include the addresses seeing as how it is very easy to see that the Brazilian Conference of Bishops is full of impostors, but anyone who is willing to contact the authorities can get the addresses from the link included with the cited source above]

* * *

You can read more about the Gender Ideology here.  This is a serious topic which needs to be understood and combated. 

The Gender Ideology, the Imminent Chastisement and Francis' Climate Change

The Ideology of Gender is the indoctrination technique being employed to pervert the minds of the youth in order to promote a majority society of homosexuals that do not reproduce. The ideology states that gender or sex is only a social construct in the minds of people.  It is in this way that the globalists and liberals seek to poison the minds of the youth and destroy the family.

The Goal of A Majority that Accepts Homosexuality as the Norm

Since "who am I to judge" came here to Brazil for WYD, the sodomites have been demanding respect with more success from the common idiots.  They recently had a parade in Rio where a transvestite was carried on a float hanging on a cross and pre-pubscent boys publicly danced scandalouly while wearing hardly any clothes.  Apparently, the Brazilian bishops had initially supported the parade, and the Archdiocese of Sao Paolo even published a letter showing its full support in what it stated was "defending human rights" so to speak [1] . This has all happened this month and some of the less conscious Catholics had no problems sharing the images while denouncing them, something I don't think of as a correct approach.

The Socialist government PT, worker's party of Brazil, headed by an ex-prisoner and convicted bank robber Dilma Rouseff, was also at this same time defeated in their efforts in the capitol to force teachers to teach children that no one is born as a "boy" or a "girl" but that they choose their gender later in life.  Effectively they seek to ban the Portuguese equivalent of the word "boy" and "girl" and force educators to refer to all as the Portuguese equivalent for a "child" (criança), being that said child may or may not have chosen his or her gender yet.  The Gender Ideology was officially defeated and now the PT is going to the individual municipalities trying to establish it one by one in the states. Although nobody wants this, they seem intent on forcing it against the wishes of the population and in the name of "democracy" and you guessed it, "human rights".  Apparently, transvestites are already using the bathroom according to the gender they identify with putting the average woman at risk of being scandalized.  So much for human rights and dignity.  Is it any wonder that traditionalists see the Second Vatican Council as the root of the problem since it officially declared that the mere dignity of a person gives him a right to believe freely [2] and the new catechism of the Catholic Church [3] goes so far as to declare this a natural right meaning that God has given all the right to believe as they wish, something which anyone can easily point out as contradicting the First Commandment ? 

There is no doubt that there is a huge agenda to push the acceptance of and promote homosexuality in all western societies and whoever disagrees with it is against "human rights" and "full of hate".  But the real question is that if there is a majority sodomite population, who really thinks that the rights of the minority will be upheld?  It's ridiculous to think such, and it would only be a matter of time before relationships of the opposite sex become scorned or even completely outlawed.  This would seem to lend a hand to the "global warming crowd" since green house gases are directly related to the other myth of "over-population".  When one looks at Francis in light of the agenda of his South American Liberation Theology counterparts, it is easy to see the correlation between all of this and where it is all going.  The Synod this fall threatens to be just one more step in the globalist agenda to promote acceptance of sodomy with the aim of a population majority of homosexuals and degenerates with the key move of tapping into the youths and the minds of the coming generations.  After all, it was after World Youth Day that the famous "who am I to judge" statement was made, and I don't think that that was any accident.  The new "encyclical" also falls in line with all of this of course, but most fail to see the significance.    

Demographics Change: The Mohammedan Rise  

Certainly, many have seen the recent video uploaded of the terrorist network ISIS executing spies horrendously by lowering several in a cage until they drown and switching to an underwater camera to record their deaths and chaining a few others together and recording the explosion of their heads while chanting Islamic "prayers". As we are way overdue for another Lepanto, the leaders in the Vatican continue to meet every so many years to pray together with Mohammedans and scandalize Catholics every so often with statements or acts that actually seem to confirm the false religion as far back as John Paul 2 kissing the Koran or as recent as Francis stating publicly that it is a "prophetic book of peace" [4].  Meanwhile the demographics in Europe are changing so fast that we are almost on the brink of seeing Europe handed over completely to the Mohammedans, in part for the degeneration and lack of large families of Europeans, and on the other hand due to the growing numbers of Mohammedans who are quickly taking their places.  "Germany and France have the largest Muslim populations among European Union member countries. As of 2010, there were 4.8 million Muslims in Germany (5.8% of the country’s population) and 4.7 million Muslims in France (7.5%). In Europe overall, however, Russia’s population of 14 million Muslims (10%) is the largest on the continent." [5]

While all this is happening, just earlier this month the top official for the Mohammedans in France has instructed his followers to convert Catholic churches into mosques, something that has already been happening as the droves of former Catholics are abandoning the Faith, which the newer generations have only come to know as presented to them in a watered down shell of the Novus Ordo, and the empty churches one by one are being handed over to the Mohammedans for use.  Does anyone really expect this to never hit home in North or South America?  It's only a matter of time.

Considerations 

Certainly these are dark times that we are in, and not many doubt this.  On one side there are the sodomites and on the other the growing threat of Islam and the authorities of the Church seem to have abandoned us to both.  It could be that in this is where we will see the providential mission of Russia. While many do not choose to trust Putin, it is no secret that he has presented himself as a stumbling block to the advance of the New World Order and the loss of Russian identity which must take place in order for Russia too to be swallowed up in the globalist plan.  Praying the the 15 decades of the Rosary daily for the consecration of Russia is important.  

The modern outlook of "it's okay to be gay" should be combated vigorously.  The modern error is that we must not judge.  Everything is taken out of context and the only thing from Sacred Scripture being pushed is to not judge and to love.  Everything else is quickly forgotten.  This is quickly parroted by today's youth, and suddenly those who seem to oppose the sodomite agenda are now judged as hypocrites and hated.  It seems that the illiterate masses believe that they can cite the Bible against those who seek to do all that Christ mandated.  A complete perversion of the modern mind which seeks to pervert all that it comes in contact with.  Any idiot knows that Christ wanted us to judge the difference between right and wrong, but since few believe in such things as eternal damnation or the soul, it is a waste of time trying to explain to modern minds the understanding of not making a subjective judgement onto the souls of others.  In these regards we don't have much to do except watch and pray and wait for a great chastisement; is there any room for doubt?

It seems that a force for the advance of the sodomites is in changing language. This should be given consideration also.  They started by taking a completely neutral word with a positive meaning like "gay".  This term should be avoided because it is their agenda.  It is their terminology.  Words associated with shame that were all too common when I was kid shouldn't be termed as "hate". Suddenly if you use the word "fag" to describe a sexual deviant then you are labeled as a "hater".  People will even go so far as to say that they feel offended because they have a family member that is "gay".  One should not hesitate to inform them that homosexuality is a sexual aberration and is unnatural.  If this same person had a family member that was an alcoholic and sleeping in the street, would they be inclined to feel just as offended if you said something against being a drunkard?  Probably not.  In fact, the advance in the globalist agenda has caused a change in perspective on this note.  Whereas a drunkard would receive help from his family to overcome his problem, a person with a sodomite in their family treats the issue differently making sure to inform everyone that they accept and love the family member, something that actually works to encourage the unnatural act.  They could actually be considered no less different than accomplices of the alcoholic whom they also support in the alcoholism or crack addict whom they should support for the drug habit.  It's a complete perversion of principles that propagates the evil of our times and will only have a conclusion of leading to a majority of a sodomite population, which is good for your global warming and population control critics.  To work against this, those who are aware of the problem should not hesitate to set the good example for children and maintain a position with others which expresses the problem in words which invoke shame cost what it may.  The globalist seek to indoctrinate the minds of children in order to prepare the New World Order.


Addendum 

This week a Brazilian Jesuit priest of the diocese São Miguel Paulista in São Paolo, Brazil, Fr. Luis Corrêa Lima, published a prayer for the faithful in the ordinary of the Mass where he asks the Lord that the "the offensive, homophobic and hysterical fundamentalists in Congress to be confronted with courage and serenity by the rise of libertarian causes, we beseech thee"..."so that the dialogue about sexuality carries the christian churches to overcome the demonization of affective relationships, we beseech thee"......"so that in Brazil sexual criminality ceases/ and all people are guaranteed their rights as regards their own sexual orientation, we beseech thee".... [6]

Apparently, someone in the diocese was upset that the Socialist ruling party was defeated in congress from being able to indoctrinate the minds of children, so now they indoctrinate the minds of their parishioners with their extreme leftists propaganda.

See also Gender Ideology Betrayal

FOOTNOTES

1) 
 http://www.icatolica.com/2015/06/apoio-tema-da-parada-gay-comissao-da.html

2) Dignitatis Humanae, "A sense of the dignity of the human person has been impressing itself more and more deeply on the consciousness of contemporary man,(1) and the demand is increasingly made that men should act on their own judgment..."

3)The new Catechism of the Catholic Church states:

“The right to religious liberty is neither a moral license to adhere to error, nor a supposed right to error, but rather a natural right of the human person to civil liberty, i.e., immunity, within just limits, from external constraint in religious matters by political authorities. This natural right ought to be acknowledged in the juridical order of society in such a way that it constitutes a civil right.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, §2108).

4)   
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/1/pope-francis-koran-is-a-prophetic-book-of-peace/

5) 
 http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/01/15/5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe/

6) See more about this incident at the pseudo-traditionalist blog Fratres in Unum in Portuguese...
     http://fratresinunum.com/2015/06/22/folheto-escandaloso-atribuido-a-paroquia-da-diocese-de-sao-miguel-paulista-causa-perplexidade-em-redes-sociais/